🔴 Claude + CENDOJ: Cómo encontrar JURISPRUDENCIA Perfecta en 5 segundos.

Summary

Carlos Rivero explica por qué herramientas como ChatGPT o Gemini suelen inventar jurisprudencia al intentar consultar el CENDOJ, debido a sistemas anti-bot. Para resolver esto, enseña a usar Claude Desktop con Claude Code para realizar técnicas de scraping, extraer sentencias reales y crear una base de datos propia utilizando Pinecone. Este sistema permite a los abogados verificar documentos legales en minutos, eliminando las alucinaciones de la IA y optimizando drásticamente el consumo de tokens y el tiempo de trabajo.

Topics covered

• Limitaciones de IA en jurisprudencia
• Uso de Claude Code

+6 more topics (full content when you follow the channel)

Transcript excerpt

This document you are seeing on screen is an administrative appeal with more than 35 Supreme Court rulings CETA. And the best part is that all these rulings were entered by an artificial intelligence tool and fully verified in less than 5 minutes, whereas a lawyer would have taken 5 hours to review it manually. And let's be honest, artificial intelligence has advanced tremendously in the last two years. But the truth is, despite all these advances, if you take HGPT right now and ask them to draft a lawsuit for you, they will most likely cite 10, 15, 20 Supreme Court rulings, but then you review them one by one and surprise, everything or almost everything has already been invented. This occurs because currently the main jurisprudential database in Spain, which is the one that the different artificial intelligence models consult or try to consult, such as Cendog, has an anti-capcha syst…